![]() Helix at rock and metal which other users also discovered in independ tests at 128 kbps. This sample shows LAME's statistical superiority vs. Hypnotize by White Stripes from Elephant - garage rock The two LAME encoders are statistically better than iTunes and are tied to Fraunhofer and Helix which are tied to iTunes. ITunes, LAME 3.98.2, Fraunhofer and Helix are tied on first place, followed by LAME 3.97 that comes out second and the low anchor that loses again.īTW, did you know that this sample is also called the "The Mother of the MP3" since Karlheinz Brandenburg used it to tune the MP3 encoder he was woking on? :)ĭanse Macabre by Camille Saint-Saëns - symphonic orchestra Tom's Diner by Suzanne Vega from Solitude Standing - female a cappella LAME 3.98.2, Fraunhofer, LAME 3.97 and Helix are tied on first place, followed by iTunes on second place and the low anchor l3enc on third place. LAME 3.98.2 however is statistically on par with iTunes, Fraunhofer and LAME 3.97. Helix is statistically better than iTunes, Fraunhofer and LAME 3.97 and it is tied to LAME 3.98.2. In The Night by Pet Shop Boys from Disco - electronic dance LAME 3.97 is statistically better than LAME 3.98.2 and is tied to iTunes, Fraunhofer and Helix which however are not significantly better than LAME 3.98.2. Waiting by Green Day from International Superhits! - rock San Francisco Bay Blues by Eric Clapton from Unplugged - country / bluesĪll contenders are tied on first place, the low anchor is last. ITunes, LAME 3.98.2, Fraunhofer and Helix are tied on first place, followed by LAME 3.97 which comes second and finally the low anchor that is close on the third position. As expected, the low anchor is last.Ĭhariots Of Fire by Vangelis from Madagascar - instrumental (synth brass) ITunes, Fraunhofer and Helix are tied on first place, followed by LAME 3.98.2 on second place and LAME 3.97 on third place. The best codec for a person is dependent on his own preferences and the type of music he prefers.įinalfantasy - instrumental (harpsichords) Important note: These plots represent group preferences (for the particular group of people who participated in the test). One codec can be said to be better than another with 95% confidence if the bottom of its segment is at or above the top of the competing codec's line segment. This analysis is identical to the one used in Roberto Amorim's listening tests. The mean rating given to each codec is indicated by the middle point of each vertical line segment and the value is printed next to it.Įach vertical line segment represents the 95% confidence interval (using ANOVA analysis) for each codec. The number of listeners used to compute the means (average ratings) and 95% confidence intervals are given on each plot. How to interpret the plots: Each plot is drawn with six codecs on the X axis and the rating given (1.0 to 5.0) on the Y axis. If your packing utility supports RAR archives, you can also download a signed, locked and solid RAR file containing all results for all samples.Įncryption key can be downloaded from here. These are the summary results of the public MP3 listening test 128 kbps. Results of the public MP3 listening test 128 kbps (October 2008) Results of the public MP3 listening test 128 kbps (October 2008)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |